2. Measurement Process Characterization
2.6. Case studies

## Evaluation of type B uncertainty and propagation of error

Focus of this case study The purpose of this case study is to demonstrate uncertainty analysis using statistical techniques coupled with type B analyses and propagation of error. It is a continuation of the case study of type A uncertainties.
Background - description of measurements and constraints The measurements in question are volume resistivities (ohm.cm) of silicon wafers which have the following definition:
= Xo.Ka.Ft .t.Ft/s
with explanations of the quantities and their nominal values shown below:
= resistivity = 0.00128 ohm.cm
X = voltage/current (ohm)
t = thicknesswafer(cm) = 0.628 cm
Ka = factorelectrical = 4.50 ohm.cm
FF = correctiontemp
Ft/s = factorthickness/separation 1.0
Type A evaluations The resistivity measurements, discussed in the case study of type A evaluations, were replicated to cover the following sources of uncertainty in the measurement process, and the associated uncertainties are reported in units of resistivity (ohm.cm).
Need for propagation of error Not all factors could be replicated during the gauge experiment. Wafer thickness and measurements required for the scale corrections were measured off-line. Thus, the type B evaluation of uncertainty is computed using propagation of error. The propagation of error formula in units of resistivity is as follows:
Standard deviations for type B evaluations Standard deviations for the type B components are summarized here. For a complete explanation, see the publication (Ehrstein and Croarkin).
Electrical measurements There are two basic sources of uncertainty for the electrical measurements. The first is the least-count of the digital volt meter in the measurement of X with a maximum bound of
a = 0.0000534 ohm

which is assumed to be the half-width of a uniform distribution. The second is the uncertainty of the electrical scale factor. This has two sources of uncertainty:

1. error in the solution of the transcendental equation for determining the factor
2. errors in measured voltages

The maximum bounds to these errors are assumed to be half-widths of

a = 0.0001 ohm.cm and a = 0.00038 ohm.cm
respectively, from uniform distributions. The corresponding standard deviations are shown below.
sx = 0.0000534/ = 0.0000308 ohm

Thickness The standard deviation for thickness, t, accounts for two sources of uncertainty:
1. calibration of the thickness measuring tool with precision gauge blocks
2. variation in thicknesses of the silicon wafers
The maximum bounds to these errors are assumed to be half-widths of
a = 0.000015 cm and a = 0.000001 cm
respectively, from uniform distributions. Thus, the standard deviation for thickness is
Temperature correction The standard deviation for the temperature correction is calculated from its defining equation as shown below. Thus, the standard deviation for the correction is the standard deviation associated with the measurement of temperature multiplied by the temperature coefficient, C(t) = 0.0083. The maximum bound to the error of the temperature measurement is assumed to be the half-width
a = 0.13 °C
of a triangular distribution. Thus the standard deviation of the correction for
is
Thickness scale factor The standard deviation for the thickness scale factor is negligible.
Associated sensitivity coefficients Sensitivity coefficients for translating the standard deviations for the type B components into units of resistivity (ohm.cm) from the propagation of error equation are listed below and in the error budget. The sensitivity coefficient for a source is the multiplicative factor associated with the standard deviation in the formula above; i.e., the partial derivative with respect to that variable from the propagation of error equation.
a6 = (/X) = 100/0.111 = 900.901
a7 = (/Ka) = 100/4.50 = 22.222
a8 = (/t) = 100/0.628 = 159.24
a9 = (/FT) = 100
a10 = (/Ft/S) = 100
Sensitivity coefficients and degrees of freedom Sensitivity coefficients for the type A components are shown in the case study of type A uncertainty analysis and repeated below. Degrees of freedom for type B uncertainties based on assumed distributions, according to the convention, are assumed to be infinite.
Error budget showing sensitivity coefficients, standard deviations and degrees of freedom The error budget showing sensitivity coefficients for computing the relative standard uncertainty of volume resistivity (ohm.cm) with degrees of freedom is outlined below.

Error budget for volume resistivity (ohm.cm)
Source Type Sensitivity Standard
Deviation
DF

Repeatability A a1 = 0 0.0729 300
Reproducibility A a2 = 0.0362 50
Run-to-run A a3 = 1 0.0197 5
Probe #2362 A a4 = 0.0162 5
Wiring
Configuration A
A a5 = 1 0 --
Resistance
ratio
B a6 = 900.901 0.0000308
Electrical
scale
B a7 = 22.222 0.000227
Thickness B a8 = 159.20 0.00000868
Temperature
correction
B a9 = 100 0.000441
Thickness
scale
B a10 = 100 0 --

Standard uncertainty The standard uncertainty is computed as:
Approximate degrees of freedom and expanded uncertainty The degrees of freedom associated with u are approximated by the Welch-Satterthwaite formula as:

This calculation is not affected by components with infinite degrees of freedom, and therefore, the degrees of freedom for the standard uncertainty is the same as the degrees of freedom for the type A uncertainty. The critical value at the 0.05 significance level with 42 degrees of freedom, from the t-table, is 2.018 so the expanded uncertainty is
U = 2.018 u = 0.13 ohm.cm