|
7.
Product and Process Comparisons
7.2. Comparisons based on data from one process 7.2.4. Does the proportion of defectives meet requirements?
|
|||
| Confidence intervals are another way of testing hypotheses |
Confidence intervals that bracket the population proportion
defective, p, are an alternative method for testing
hypotheses regarding proportion defectives. Confidence intervals
corresponding to the hypotheses tests on the
previous page at a
100(1- )%
confidence level are expressed as
where |
||
| Important restriction |
These confidence intervals are approximate and are based on a
normal approximation to the binomial distribution which is valid
if N is large enough. We can use the same rule-of-thumb
for determining whether or not N is sufficiently large
as was used in preceding
section.
Methods for constructing confidence intervals
where N is small are shown on the next page.
Criteria for choosing a sample size in
order to guarantee detecting a change of size
|
||
| Example of one-sided confidence interval |
The 95% one-sided confidence interval for p0
for the example from the previous
page is:
Because the hypothesized value of p0 = 0.10 is consistent with the confidence interval, the null hypothesis of no change in the level of proportion defective is accepted. |
||
| Correction factor for sampling from a finite population without replacement |
Thus far, we have assumed that the sample comes from a continuous
production line or a very large or infinite population. If,
however, sampling is from a finite population and is done without
replacement, a correction factor is applied to the confidence
limits. The correction factor is
where N' is the number of units in the population. The
corrected 100(1-
If the population is extremely large, the correction factor will be close to one. As the sample size approaches the population size, the correction factor approaches zero. |
||