|
7.
Product and Process Comparisons
7.2. Comparisons based on data from one process 7.2.4. Does the proportion of defectives meet requirements?
|
|||
| Derivation of formula for required sample size when testing proportions | The method of determining sample sizes for testing proportions is similar to the method for determining sample sizes for testing the mean. Although the sampling distribution for proportions actually follows a binomial distribution, the normal approximation is used for this derivation. | ||
| Definition of allowable deviation | If we are interested in detecting a change in
the proportion defective of size
in either direction, the corresponding confidence interval for
p
can be written
|
||
| Relationship to confidence interval | For a (1- )%
confidence interval based on the normal distribution, where >
is the upper critical value of
the normal distribution which is exceeded with probability ,
|
||
| Minimum sample size | Thus, the minimum sample size is
|
||
| Interpretation and sample size for high probability of detecting a change | This requirement on the sample size only guarantees
that a change of size
is detected with 50% probability. The derivation of the sample size when
we are interested in protecting against a change
with probability 1 -
(where is small)
is
is
the upper critical value from
the normal distribution that is exceeded with probability . |
||
| Value for the true proportion defective | The equations above require that p be known. Usually, this is not the case. If we are interested in detecting a change relative to an historical or hypothesized value, this value is taken as the value of p for this purpose. Note that taking the value of the proportion defective to be 0.5 leads to the largest possible sample size. | ||
| Example of calculating sample size for testing proportion defective | Suppose that a department manager needs to be
able to detect any change above 0.10 in the current proportion defective
of his product line, which is running at approximately 10% defective. He
is interested in a one-sided test and does not want to stop the line except
when the process has clearly degraded and, therefore, he chooses a significance
level for the test of 5%. Suppose, also, that he is willing to take a risk
of 10% of failing to detect a change of this magnitude. With these criteria:
|
||