6.
Process or Product Monitoring and Control
6.5.
Tutorials
6.5.4.
Elements of Multivariate Analysis
6.5.4.3.
Hotelling's T squared
6.5.4.3.2.
|
T2
Chart for Subgroup Averages -- Phase II
|
|
Phase II requires recomputing and
and different control limits
|
Determining the UCL that is to be subsequently applied to
future subgroups entails recomputing, if necessary,
and ,
and using a constant and an
value that are different from the form given
for the Phase I control limits. The
form is different because different distribution theory is involved since
future subgroups are assumed to be independent of the "current" set of
subgroups that is used in calculating and .
(The same thing happens with
charts; the problem is simply ignored through the use of 3-sigma limits,
although a different approach should be used when there is a small number
of subgroups -- and the necessary theory has been worked out.)
|
Illustration
|
To illustrate, assume that
a
subgroups had been discarded (with possibly )
so that
subgroups are used in obtaining and .
We shall let these two values be represented by
and
to distinguish them from the original values, and ,
before any subgroups are deleted. Future values to be plotted
on the multivariate chart would then be obtained from
with
denoting an arbitrary vector containing the averages for the
characteristics for a single subgroup obtained in the future. Each of
these future values would be plotted on the multivariate chart and
compared with
|
Phase II control limits
|
with
denoting the number of the original subgroups that are
deleted before computing and .
Notice that the equation for the control limits for Phase II
given here does not reduce to
the equation for the control limits for
Phase I when ,
nor should we expect it to since the Phase I UCL is used when testing for
control of the entire set of subgroups that is used in computing
and .
|